S0049-3848(14)00284-9

Original Article

Comparison of Fenugreek Crop Evapotranspiration Measured by a Micro-lysimeter, Field Water Balance Method and Automatic Closed Canopy Chamber

Year: 2021 | Month: March | Volume 14 | Issue 1

References (26)

1.Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrig. Drain. Paper 56, UN-FAO, Rome, Itlay.

View at Google Scholar

2.Baldocchi, D., Valentini R., Running S., Oechel, W. and Dahlman, R. 1996. Strategies for measuring and modelling carbon dioxide and water vapour fluxes over terrestrial ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol., 2: 159-168.

View at Google Scholar

3.Bekku, Y., Koizumi, H., Oikawa, T. and Iwaki, H. 1997. Examination of four methods for measuring soil respiration. Appl. Soil Ecol., 5(3): 247-254.

View at Google Scholar

4.Bowen, I.S. 1926. The ratio of heat losses by conduction and by evaporation from any water surface. Phys. Rev., 27: 779–787.

View at Google Scholar

5.Burkart, S., Manderscheid, R. and Weigel, H.J. 2007. Design and performance of a portable gas exchange chamber system for CO2 and H2 O-flux measurements in crop canopies. Environ. Exp. Bot., 61: 25–34.

View at Google Scholar

6.Campbell, G.S. and Norman, J.M. 1998. The light environment of plant canopies. In: An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. SSBM., pp. 247-278.

View at Google Scholar

7.Dhavan, V. 2017. Water and Agriculture in India. Background paper for the South Asia expert panel during the Global Forum for Food and Agriculture (GFFA). OAV – German Asia-Pacific Business Association within the frame of the Bilateral Cooperation Project on the Development of International Cooperation with Asia, co-funded by the Federail Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL). The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), New Delhi.

View at Google Scholar

8.Elghany, G.G.A., Shazly, M.M.E. and Hashem, H.A.E.A. 2017. Water management for the Fenugreek plant and its response to biofertilization in north Sinai. Egypt. J. Appl. Sci., 32: (12 B).

View at Google Scholar

9.Gowda, P.H., Howell, T.A., Paul, G., Colaizzi, P.D., Marek, T.H., Su, B. and Copeland, K.S. 2013. Deriving hourly evapotranspiration rates with SEBS: A lysimetric evaluation. Vadose Zone J., 12(3): 102-109.

View at Google Scholar

10.IPCC. 2001. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) third assessment report climate change 2001. IPCC. Geneva, Switzerland. Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/ accessed 19th August, 2018.

View at Google Scholar

11.Livingston, G. and Hutchinson, G.L. 1995. Enclosure based measurement of trace gas exchange: applications and sources of error. In: Matson, P., Harris, R. (Eds.), Biogenic trace gases: Measuring emissions from soil and water. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

View at Google Scholar

12.Luo, C. 2018. Portable canopy chamber measurements of evapotranspiration in corn, soybean and reconstructed prairie. Agric. Water Manag., 198: 1-9.

View at Google Scholar

13.McJannet, D.L.,Vertessy, R.A., Tapper, N.J., O’Sullivan, S.K., Beringer, J. and Cleugh, H. 1996. Soil and litter evaporation beneath re-growth and old-growth mountain ash forest. CRC for Catchment Hydrology, Clayton, Vic.

View at Google Scholar

14.McLeod, M.K., Daniel, H., Faulkner, R. and Murison, R. 2004. Evaluation of an enclosed portable chamber to measure crop and pasture actual evapotranspiration at small scale. Agric. Water Manag., 67: 15–34.

View at Google Scholar

15.Narmada, Water Resources, Water supply and Kalpsar Department, 2010. Details of surface water and ground water resources of Gujarat. Available at https://guj-nwrws. gujarat.gov.in. Assessed on 11th October 2019.

View at Google Scholar

16.Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1967. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR., New Delhi, pp. 57-67.

View at Google Scholar

17.Rana, G. and Katerji, N. 2000. Measurement and Estimation of Actual Evapotranspiration in the Field under Mediterranean Climate: A Review. Eur. J. Agron., 13: 125-153.

View at Google Scholar

18.Reicosky, D. 1990. Canopy gas exchange in the field: closed chambers. Remote Sens. Reviews., 5: 163-177.

View at Google Scholar

19.Reicosky, D.C. and Peters, D.B. 1977. A portable chamber for rapid evapotranspiration measurements on field plots. Agron. J., 69: 729-732.

View at Google Scholar

20.Stannard, D.I. 1988. Use of a hemispherical chamber for measurement of evapotranspiration. USGS SIRs., 1988- 452, pp. 18.

View at Google Scholar

21.Steduto, P., Cetinkoku, O., Albrizio, R. and Kanber, R. 2002. Automated closed-system canopy chamber for continuous field-crop monitoring of CO2 and H2 O fluxes. Agric. For. Meteorol., 111: 171-186.

View at Google Scholar

22.Stewart, J.B. 1984. Measurements and predictions of evapotranspiration from forested and agricultural catchments. Agric. Water Manag., 8: 1–28.

View at Google Scholar

23.Street, L.E., Shaver, G.R., William, M., Van Wijik, M.T. 2007. What is the relationship between changes in canopy leaf area and changes in photosynthetic CO2 flux in arctic ecosystems? J. Ecol., 95: 139-150.

View at Google Scholar

24.Thomas, M.D. and Hill, G.R. 1937. The continuous measurement of photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration of alfalfa and wheat growing under field conditions (I). Plant Physiol., 12: 285–307

View at Google Scholar

25.Wagner, S.W. and Reicosky, D.C. 1992. Closed-chamber effects on leaf temperature, canopy photosynthesis, and evapotranspiration. Agron. J., 84: 731–738.

View at Google Scholar

26.Yang, F., White, M.A., Michaelis, A.R., Ichii, K., Hashimoto, H., Votava, P., Zhu, A.X. and Nemani, R.R. 2006. Prediction of continental-scale evapotranspiration by combining MODIS and AmeriFlux data through support vector machine. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens., 44: 3452–3461.

View at Google Scholar

International Journal of Agriculture Environment & Biotechnology(IJAEB)| In Association with AAEB

27133554 - Visitors since February 20, 2019